| |
Master of Space
by Karl Grossman professor
of journalism at the
State University of New York/College at Old Westbury.
The Irish Times
Monday, February 5, 2001
On November 1, the General
Assembly of the United Nations voted to reaffirm the Outer Space
Treaty--the fundamental international law that establishes that
space should be reserved for peaceful uses.
Almost 140 nations voted for the resolution entitled "Prevention
of an Arms Race in Outer Space." It recognizes "the common
interest of all mankind in the exploration and use of outer space
for peaceful purposes," reaffirms the will of all states that
the exploration and use of outer space "shall be for peaceful
purposes and shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interest
of all countries," and declares "that prevention of an
arms race in outer space would avert a grave danger for international
peace and security."
Only two nations declined to support this bill -- the United States
and
Israel. Both abstained.
For the United States, the issue goes way beyond missile defense.
The U.S. military explicitly says it wants to "control"
space to protect its economic interests and establish superiority
over the world.
Several documents reveal the plans. Take Vision for 2020, a 1996
report of the U.S. Space Command, which "coordinates the use
of Army, Navy, and Air Force space forces" and was set up in
1985 to "help institutionalize the use of space."
The multicolored cover of Vision for 2020 shows a weapon shooting
a laser beam from space and zapping a target below. The report opens
with the following:
"U.S. Space Command -- dominating the space dimension of military
operations to protect U.S. interests and investment. Integrating
Space Forces into warfighting capabilities across the full spectrum
of conflict." A century ago, "Nations built navies to
protect and enhance their commercial interests" by ruling the
seas, the report notes. Now it is time to rule space. "The
medium of space is the fourth medium of warfare--along with land,
sea, and air," it proclaims on page three. "The emerging
synergy of space superiority with land, sea, and air superiority
will lead to Full Spectrum Dominance."
The Air Force publishes similar pamphlets. "Space is the ultimate
'high ground," declares Guardians of the High Frontier, a 1997
report by the Air Force Space Command. Proudly displayed in that
report is a Space Command uniform patch and motto: Master of Space.
Nuclear power is crucial to this scenario. "In the next two
decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based
weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy
and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict,"
says New World Vistas: Air and Space Power for the 2lst Century,
a 1996 U.S. Air Force board report. "These advances will enable
lasers with reasonable mass and cost to effect very many kills....
Setting the emotional issues of nuclear power aside, this technology
offers a viable alternative for large amounts of power in space."
Corporate interests are directly involved in helping set the U.S.
space
doctrine -- a fact the military flaunts. In its 1998 "Long
Range Plan," the
U.S. Space Command acknowledges 75 participating corporations --
including Aerojet, Hughes Space, Lockheed Martin, and TRW.
The pr spin is that the U.S. military push into space is about "missile
defense" or defense of U.S. space satellites. But the volumes
of material coming out of the military are concerned mainly with
offense -- with using space to establish military domination over
the world below.
"It's politically sensitive, but it's going to happen. Some
people don't
want to hear this, and it sure isn't in vogue, but absolutely
- we're
going to fight in space," General Joseph W. Ashy, the former
commander-in-chief of the U.S. Space Command told Aviation Week
and Space Technology in 1996.
"We're going to fight from space, and we're going to fight
into space.
That's why the U.S. has development programs in directed energy
and
hit-to-kill mechanisms. We will engage terrestrial targets someday
-- ships, airplanes, land targets -- from space."
Space is "increasingly at the center of our national and economic
security," agreed General Richard B. Myers, current commander-in-chief
of the U.S. Space Command, in a speech entitled "Implementing
Our Vision for Space Control," which he delivered in April
1999 to the U.S. Space Foundation in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
"The threat, ladies and gentlemen, I believe is real,"
he said. "It's a
threat to our economic well-being. This is why we must work together
to find common ground between commercial imperatives and the President's
tasking to me for space control and protection."
"With regard to space dominance, we have it, we like it, and
we're going to keep it," said Keith Hall, Assistant Secretary
of the Air Force for Space, in a 1997 speech to the National Space
Club. "Space is in the nation's economic interest."
In Congress, one avid booster of U.S. space dominance is Senator
Bob Smith, Republican of New Hampshire. Smith believes that national
security depends on "space supremacy." He is interested
in breaking up the Air Force and creating a "Space Force."
Even the Council on Foreign Relations -- usually characterized as
centrist -- has come on board. In 1998, it published a booklet entitled
Space, Commerce, and National Security, written by Air Force Colonel
Frank Klotz, a military fellow at the council.
"The most immediate task of the United States in the years
ahead is to sustain and extend its leadership in the increasingly
intertwined fields of military and commercial space. This requires
a robust and continuous presence in space," says the report.
The U.S. government is pouring massive amounts of public money --
an estimated $6 billion a year, not counting what is secretly spent
-- into the military development of space. And the United States
has signed a multi-million dollar contract with TRW and Boeing to
build a Space-Based Laser Readiness Demonstrator. The military's
poster for this laser shows it firing a ray into space while above
it an American flag somehow manages to wave.
|