|
|
|
|
| |
Who is Doug Rokke and what is he saying?
Professor Doug Rokke visited Australian in June-July 2003 to highlight
the problems of depleted uranium weapons.
Professor Rokkes position and the background to it. He has argued
that DU weapons are illegal.
View following articles:
Age
newspaper; Depleted
Uranium: Uses and Hazards by Doug Rokke, Ph.D. This paper is updated
version of the paper presented; Sunday
Herald; Truthout
site; Rediff
site.
|
| |
|
The
point of the tour:
Professor Rokke
has been brought to Australia to raise awareness about the use and
dangers of DU weapons. We urge Australians to lobby the Australian
government seeking: |
| 1. |
Medical
assessment, treatment and long term monitoring of all those who have
been exposed to DU in Iraq, Kosovo and any other location where DU
has been used. This includes the local people in each place, Australian
troops and those of other nations, and any other persons who have
may have been exposed. |
| 2. |
Clean
up of all DU debris from all situations where it has been used, to
prevent further adverse health and environmental effects. This includes
removing and disposing of penetrator fragments, contaminated equipment,
and oxide contamination. Leaving radioactive debris around is environmental
vandalism as it contributes to the overall contamination and toxification
of the environment. |
| 3. |
A
ban on DU weapons. Australia should ban using its troops in any alliance
that uses DU weapons and should work for an international ban on DU
weapons. |
| 4. |
Action
sheet here |
|
| |
|
Background
briefing: |
| |
|
Scientists
call for clean up:
The Royal Society in Britain (a scientific
body) has called for the Coalition to reveal where DU weapons were used,
and to clean up the debris - ABC
interview; April
2003 media release.
International Physicians for
the Prevention of Nuclear War
New Scientist provides a summary
of the issues raised by scientific reports, going back to 1999.
Scientists for Global
Responsibility |
| |
|
Are
the weapons legal? |
| |
|
A
number of organisations are arguing that use of DU in munitions contravenes
Article 3 of The UN convention on prohibitions or restrictions
on the use of certain conventional weapons which may be deemed to be excessively
injurious or to have indiscriminate effects and protocols (1980) |
| |
|
| Outlining
the issues |
 |
Discounted
casualities: the
human costs of depleted uranium |
| Low
Level Radiation Campaign |
| Campaign
against depleted uranium |
| Children
of the Gulf War |
| Traprock
Peace Organisation |
| The
European Committee on Radiation Risk argues that one cannot determine
the health effects of internal radiation on the basis of studies of
external radiation. View executive summary here.
The development of this report was supported by some members of the
European Parliament and two charitable organisations. The media release
says: “As an example, the risk model presented in the new report
is employed to calculate the overall human death toll of all nuclear
pollution exposures showing that over 50 million people will die or
have died as a result of the radioactive releases up to 1989. Dr Busby
commented, ' The model shows clearly that the human race cannot afford
to allow contamination of the environment with these radioactive materials.
The politicians must realise that if the military are allowed to use
Depleted Uranium or tactical nuclear weapons in any future war, there
will be terrible consequences for soldiers and civilians both in the
area of use and, as Chernobyl has taught, much further away.”
|
| US
Gulf War Veterans website . |
| BBC
website |
|
| |
|
Facts
about depleted uranium - manufacture, storage and risks
at US
Department of energy website |
| |
|
The
United Nations Evidence |
| |
|
| The
UN Environmental Program has a post-conflict assessment team. There
is a clear shift in their view of DU as their work has progressed,
and they now take it much more seriously. |
| 1. |
Report
on DU in Iraq Desk study on the Environment in Iraq
See especially pages 80-86 |
| 2. |
Report
on DU in Bosnia Hertzegovnia. Depleted Uranium in Bosnia and Hertzegovnia
May 2003. See especially pages 48-52, 59-61 and 71. The report points
to the problem of water contamination as a result of corrosion of
DU weapon debris. |
| 3. |
See
World
Health Organisation fact sheet |
| 4. |
The
WHO
website also includes a detailed scientific monograph reviewing
the literature available about DU Depleted Uranium: Sources, Exposure
and Health Effects - Full Report at |
|
| |
|
The
precautionary approach:
|
| |
|
When
reading reports that claim that there is little evidence of health effects,
remember that the US Department of Defence, and its UK equivalent have refused
to collect the necessary data that would allow an informed judgement to
be made. The Royal Society, for example, relies on scientific “modeling”
in its reports, and points to the lack of experimental data. Its conclusions
are therefore tenuous. It adopts a precautionary approach, calling for a
clean up of all sites where DU weapons have been used.
The Royal
Society Media Release calling for information and clean up in Iraq.
April 2003
Media
Release on DU weapons in Iraq April 2003
Information about DU
and DU weapons
Summary of the reports The health hazards of depleted uranium: a combined
summary of parts I and II
Full reports.
Part II March
2002 and Part I May 2001 |
| |
|
A
spiritual and ethical response |
| |
|
The
Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) have a long history of opposing war.
The Friends Committee on National Legislation in the USA has a program monitoring
and lobbying on US weapons policy. Congress resolution 1483, introduced
by Rep Jim McDermott, would require certain studies regarding the health
effects of exposure to depleted uranium munitions (DU), as well as clean
up of U.S. sites that have been contaminated with DU. DU was an ingredient
in many U.S. munitions that were used during the first Persian Gulf War
and that are currently being used in the U.S.-led war on Iraq.
Further details
here
See also War
with Iraq, take 2
|
| |
|
The
Sydney Rokke Tour Depleted Uranium Website was last updated 3rd July
2003
E-mail Rev. Dr Ann Wansbrough
for further information.
Sponsors
of the Sydney leg of Professor Rokke’s tour include:
Scientists for Global Responsibility; UnitingCare NSW.ACT; Economic
Reform Australia;
Walk Against the War; Coalition The Greens; Search Foundation; NSW Independent
Teachers Union;
CFMEU Construction and General NSW Branch
|
| |
|
|